IRC 7122(f)
Bauche v. Comm’r, filed May 20, 2025 at T.C. Memo 2025-48 allows the Court to explore the possibility that the IRS has waited too long to review an Offer in Compromise, and thus under the statute, it is deemed accepted. The rule in IRC 7122(f) states in part: “[a]ny Offer in Compromise submitted under this section shall be deemed to be accepted by the Secretary if such offer is not rejected by the Secretary before the date which is 24 months after the date of submission of such offer.” The taxpayer landed in a Collection Due Process hearing after issuance of a lien notice. During that proceeding, it was determined that filing an Offer in Compromise made sense. The taxpayer argued that the IRS did not reject its Offer in Compromise until the Settlement Officer issued its Notice of Determination, which was more than 24 months later. The IRS argued that the Offer had been rejected when Appeals mailed the taxpayer a letter saying the IRS was rejecting the Offer, in spite of the fact that a final Notice of Determination associated with the conclusion of the Collection Due Process hearing had not been sent out. The Court indicated that if it agreed with the taxpayer, it would have created a dilemma for Appeals because they may not have resolved all issues associated with the Collection Due Process hearing, but could be forced to issue a Notice of Determination to meet the 24 month deadline. The Court felt that the letter issued by the IRS through Appeals regarding its rejection of the Offer, even though the Appeals hearing was not fully resolved, clearly indicated to the taxpayer that the Offer was rejected. This illustrates the premise that part of the Collection Due Process hearing process is to entertain collection alternatives, but that is not the entire purpose.
